Definitions, prevalence and sources of violence in our countries
Defining what violence is, is an important precondition when discussing prevalence, sources and implications for intervention and prevention initiatives. This is especially important for international projects and discussions, as culture and history, language and the educational system have an impact on what is perceived as violence.
"Violence" is often mixed with other terms describing similar phenomena, like "bullying" or "aggression". While for instance some definitions focus on physical violence, some others also include verbal and mental forms. There is even no agreement between different disciplines executing studies on violence (Schäfer & Korn, 2000).
Two internationally common definitions of violence are the ones from Olweus and the World Health Organisation (WHO):
Olweus (1999, p. 12): Violence is "aggressive behaviour where the actor or perpetrator uses his or her own body or an object (including a weapon) to inflict (relatively serious) injury or discomfort upon another individual".
WHO (1999, p.2): "The intentional use of physical force or power, threatened or actual, against oneself, another person, or against a group or community, that either results in or has a high likelihood of resulting in injury, death, psychological harm, mal-development, or deprivation."
When talking about violence in school, the term "bullying" or its equivalent in other languages is usually used (Finnish: "koulukiusaaminen", Danish: "mobbe", German: "Mobbing", Portuguese: "maltrato entre iguais").
A common definition of bullying is given by Olweus (1993, p. 9):
"A student is being bullied or victimised when he or she is exposed, repeatedly and over time, to negative actions on the part of one or more other students."
Even this very broad and general definition does not include the whole range of violent acts (e.g. it does not mention violent or aggressive acts from teachers against pupils). Nevertheless, in the VISIONARY project we agree with this definition by Olweus as it is broad enough to unite the different perspectives of our countries and is a good starting point for discussions about violence in school, bullying and its prevention.
As pointed out in the definition section, there are striking differences in the way violence is defined. In some studies "violence" is not defined at all. In addition, different instruments and methods have been used for collecting data. All these differences allow only limited comparisons of national data.
All similarities and differences we refer to in this section should therefore be regarded as tendencies, and should be interpreted with caution.
In Denmark, Finland, Germany, Portugal and the UK, the following common tendencies have been detected (for details compare the national sections):
In all our countries numerous studies reveal that the development of both violent behaviour and behaviour that puts pupils at risk of becoming victimised do not relate to a single source, but numerous sources that interact in a complex way.
The following sources have been associated with the development of violent behaviour (for details compare the national sections):
The following sources have been associated with the potential to become a victim:
Olweus, D., (1999), Sweden. In P.K. Smith et al. (eds),The Nature of School Bullying: A Cross-National perspective. London: Routledge.
Olweus, D., (1993), Bullying at school. What we know and what we can do. Oxford: Blackwell.
Pfeiffer, C., (1998), Trends in Juvenile Violence in European Countries. Download: http://www.ncjrs.org/pdffiles/fs000202.pdf
Schäfer, M. & Korn, S., (2001), Tackling violence in schools: A report from Germany. Download: www.goldsmiths.ac.ac.uk/connect/reportgermany.html
World Health Organisation, (1999), " WHO information series on School Health ", Document 3, WHO, Geneva.